Method 1. Subgrade modulus C1 is calculated according to mean values of modulus of elasticity and Poisson's ratio of soil:
|
|
|
(11)
|
Method 2. Subgrade modulus C1 is calculated according to Winkler method:
|
|
|
(12)
|
where q - the mean pressure under the base of foundation.
Method 3. To determine subgrade modulus C1, the formula of method 1 is used. The difference is that in this case correction factor u to modulus of elasticity of the i-th sublayer is introduced for calculation of mean modulus of elasticity Egr3. This factor varies from u1=1 at the level of foundation base up to un=12 at the level of calculated depth of compressible stratum. It is accepted that factor u varies according to square parabola law:
|
|
|
(13)
|
Moreover, it is also accepted that additional vertical stress is distributed uniformly along the depth. Then
|
|
|
(14)
|
Method 3 is suggested in order to remove limitations of the first two methods. Limitation of method 1 - it is impossible to take into account that modulus of elasticity increases along the depth. It causes too high values of settlements and therefore too low values of subgrade modulus C1. Limitation of method 2 - at the points where applied loads vary significantly, subgrade modulus also varies significantly, but that is not proved by theory. This limitation is also placed even when modulus of elasticity increases along the depth.
For methods 1 and 3, the subgrade modulus C2 is calculated by formula:
|
|
|
(15)
|
For method 2, the subgrade modulus C2 is not calculated.